UDK: 616.314-089.27
D.V. Mikhalchenko1, H.Yu. Salyamov2, Yu.A. Makedonova3, A.V. Mikhalchenko4
ФГБОУ ВО «Волгоградский государственный медицинский университет» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 1кафедра пропедевтики стоматологических заболеваний, 2кафедра стоматологии института непрерывного медицинского и фармацевтического образова
The percentage of implant treatment failures is steadily increasing. This may be due to both General and local factors that lead to the development of parotid tissue inflammation. In this case, one of the signs of development postprostatectomy complications following dental implantation is bleeding, redness. Earlier detection of inflammatory phenomena of peri-graft tissue may contribute to the preservation of the tooth and the chewing function of the dentition. Currently, there is no single approach to the treatment of perimplantitis and mucositis. Traditional treatment is based on the use of anti-inflammatory gels and ointments. In this paper, a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of ozone treatment relative to the standard treatment regimen is performed. During 14 days, an examination and instrumental examination were performed to determine the hygienic indices, the bleeding index, the Svrakov iodine number, and periodontal screening. The implant stability coefficient was determined using the Osstel Mentor device. In all groups, there was a positive tendency to subside inflammatory phenomena, and in some cases, there was a complete cessation of the process, but the nature and timing were different depending on the methods of exposure to the pathological focus.
inflammation, tissue, implant, treatment, ozone therapy.
Михальченко Дмитрий Валерьевич – д. м. н., доцент, зав. кафедрой пропедевтики стоматологических заболеваний, Волгоградский государственный медицинский университет, e-mail: karta007@rambler.ru